Showing posts with label The Human Algorithm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Human Algorithm. Show all posts

Friday, May 13, 2016

Pantene tells women "Don't let labels hold you back!"



All around me are familiar faces
Worn out places, worn out faces
Bright and early for their daily races
Going nowhere, going nowhere

Their tears are filling up their glasses
No expression, no expression
Hide my head, I wanna drown my sorrow
No tomorrow, no tomorrow

And I find it kinda funny
I find it kinda sad
The dreams in which I'm dying
Are the best I've ever had
I find it hard to tell you
I find it hard to take
When people run in circles
It's a very, very mad world, mad world

Children waiting for the day they feel good
Happy Birthday, Happy Birthday
And I feel the way that every child should
Sit and listen, sit and listen

Went to school and I was very nervous
No one knew me, no one knew me
Hello teacher tell me what's my lesson
Look right through me, look right through me

And I find it kinda funny
I find it kinda sad
The dreams in which I'm dying
Are the best I've ever had
I find it hard to tell you
I find it hard to take
When people run in circles
It's a very, very mad world, mad world

Enlarging your world
Mad world

Mad World, by Tears for Fears

It's a mad world indeed that fundamentally the same behavior is lauded among men and decried among women.  There is an opportunity, there is support, and there is a choice, so the latter don't have to suffer misguided stereotypes.  Pantene does its part.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Microsoft rocks girls doing science


7 out of 10 girls are interested in science. Only 2 out of 10 will pursue it as a career. Let’s change that. Through the voices of these girls, we celebrate International Women’s Day and Women’s History month. We support the bright young women who participated in this project and all girls who share our belief in the empowering nature of science and technology. 
Microsoft is committed to creating opportunities for all youth. DigiGirlz is a Microsoft YouthSpark program that gives girls the opportunity to learn about careers in tech.
I just finished watching one of my favorite science fiction films - Contact (1997) - starring Jodie Foster as Dr. Ellie Arroway.  Fortunately, her father warmly nurtured a love for science in her, since she was a little girl, and this steered her passion into a career.  Mind you, she faced her fair share of doubt, dismissal and discrimination.  For instance, David Drumlin cut off her funding, then years later as her work actually bore remarkable fruit, he nosed himself deftly in and swiftly spoke on her behalf with government officials and the media.

Anyway, the world needs many more people like Ellie's father, and much fewer like Drumlin, and Microsoft is playing its part.

Monday, May 9, 2016

Venus tells the story of "&"


Show “or” the door-this is the story of “&”. The story of realizing your true potential. 
Put an end to the one-dimensional labels that limit your potential. Because you are beautiful AND smart. You can be an astronaut AND a soccer player AND a ballerina. Your life is composed of many ANDs – an empowering sum of all of the things you are, and all you want to be. Venus invites you and women everywhere to take a stand against one-dimensional labels. #UseYourAnd
So people may acknowledge a quality, a passion, an aptitude of yours.  But you are much more than that quality, passion or aptitude.  You can be geekish and stylish at the same time.  You can love physics, and still believe in God.  You can be analytic and logical, yet creative and intuitive, too.

Friday, April 29, 2016

Dove prompts women to reflect on their choices


Would you describe yourself as beautiful? In our latest film Choose Beautiful, we travel to San Francisco, Shanghai, Delhi, London and Sao Paulo to prove that beauty is a choice – and the power of this choice is in your hands.
To me, the main thrust of this social experiment is not that every woman approaching these building must go through the Beautiful door.  But simpler, more fundamental than that, it encourages every woman to be mindful of what she chooses and to understand what makes her choose whatever it is she chooses.  Such self reflection can, I believe, alter not just her choices but also her mindset, her outlook, her self-esteem or self-image.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Always redefines what #LikeAGirl means


Join Always in our epic battle to keep girls' confidence high during puberty and beyond. Using #LikeAGirl as an insult is a hard knock against any adolescent girl. And since the rest of puberty's really no picnic either, it's easy to see what a huge impact it can have on a girl's self-confidence.
Making a start by showing them that doing things #LikeAGirl is an awesome thing! 
"In my work as a documentarian, I have witnessed the confidence crisis among girls and the negative impact of stereotypes first-hand," said Lauren Greenfield, filmmaker and director of the #LikeAGirl video. "When the words 'like a girl' are used to mean something bad, it is profoundly disempowering. I am proud to partner with Always to shed light on how this simple phrase can have a significant and long-lasting impact on girls and women. I am excited to be a part of the movement to redefine 'like a girl' into a positive affirmation." 
So tell us... what do YOU do #LikeAGirl?
It's clear that both boys and girls can have very demeaning, stereotypical notions of what it means to do something like a girl.  So while I often hesitate to make sweeping generalizations about the state of affairs for a Western society like the US, there is something pervasive, pernicious perhaps about what's been built into its culture and how that culture shapes the minds and behavior of our young people.

So, as my daughter Eva Krevchuck-Villejo argues persuasively and powerfully in her article - Like a Lady?  Like a Boss! - we must keep at our efforts to redefine what it means to be girl and alter those demeaning stereotypes.

Monday, April 25, 2016

Like a Lady? Like a Boss! by Eva Krevchuck-Villejo


As a child, I spent a great deal of time with my grandma. From learning new line dances, to going on adventures at the neighborhood park, to attending monthly Filipino friend parties, she did not fail to entertain me. Almost as devout as Mary Magdalene, my grandma dragged me along to the weekly worship service, one of the less exciting activities included in my “Grandma time.” As much as Mass meant worship, it also meant socializing with elderly people, catching up on the latest Church gossip, and eating donuts after the service. While I found ways to keep myself occupied, my grandmother’s rules of conduct at Church bothered me. I was to act as “lady-like” as possible. Sit up straight. Pull hair back neatly. Speak politely. Keep my shirt tucked in. Wear my expensive dress. Blush when people complimented me. These were my grandma’s expectations for me when in public, and I was to follow them without question.

As I grew older, I stopped acting like an obedient puppy and doubted these rules. Why did having a tidy appearance, wearing over-priced clothing, and keeping my thoughts to myself classify me as a lady? In my high school world history class, I learned that historically, a lady was a woman of affluence and power. Because the term originated around 1200 C.E., a time when social class was critical to Medieval Europe, society believed that a woman who looked sophisticated and acted modestly was fit for nobility. Although “aristocrat” and “lady” both describe women who exhibit courtesy and elegance, the two titles have clear distinctions. An aristocrat holds a superior status through wealth, education, or social prestige, but a lady uses whatever gifts she has to benefit others because she recognizes her duty to society. Queen Elizabeth I, wearing ornate dresses, speaking decorously, and basking in her political supremacy, ascribed to the preceding title. But with all due respect for Her Greatness, one would expect that 500 years would cause this obsolete idea of lady to lose influence.

Sadly, this image has not entirely faded over the years. Today, some countries have allowed a distorted concept of a lady to influence federal law and modern culture. These societies, smug in their patriarchal systems and infrastructures, place little value in women beyond their appearance or classic, domestic roles. However, through passing restrictive laws on women’s basic rights, foreign governments overlook what women might accomplish if they are allowed to step over societal boundaries. As a testament to the potential of young women, Malala Yousafzai has defied the oppressive expectations of a lady in Pakistan and instead has been her own version of a lady; along the way, she became a Nobel Peace Prize-winning activist for women’s education and human rights. Malala has proven that teenage girls who come from diverse social backgrounds and are unafraid to stand against injustice and lady-like standards can evoke national, even global change.

While the United States may not be as restrictive of women as certain foreign countries, many Americans berate themselves and their sisters, nieces, or granddaughters for unlady-like behavior. Girls have been taught that a “good little lady” is one remains quiet, humble, and submissive to elders or males in her life. By encouraging unnecessarily restrained behavior, however, adults are actually doing more harm than help; they are teaching young girls to believe in the inferiority of their gender. What might this belittling concept of a lady mean in the grander scheme of the world? To start, we may be missing out on valuable ideas that could contribute to the social, political, and economic progression of our world. If certain societies did not associate the idea of a lady with powerlessness, we might even have solutions to several global issues. The world is constantly changing with new beliefs, standards, and styles; thus, girls should not be limited from growing to their full potential.

As well as diminutiveness, females are taught that physical attractiveness will make them more desirable and successful. Television commercials, magazine advertisements, and radio spiels promote products and services that can bless women with a desirable figure, covetable wardrobe, lengthy eyelashes, or perfect smile. With a slogan of “Maybe she’s born with it, maybe it’s Maybelline,” Maybelline swears that it can help women achieve beauty even if they are not naturally good-looking. Weight Watchers, a company that provides top-notch health counseling, insists that their weight loss program leads participants to prosperity. In a world in which girls are constantly told that passivity and beauty are essential, society pressures young women to conform to a historic, objectifying image of a lady. However, physical appearance and expected behavior should not be the deal-breaker. When a woman is taught that looks alone will help her to achieve their goals, she can forget about the more substantive characteristics of a lady, a woman who has an inquisitive mind, honesty in words and in actions, confidence in individuality and ideas, and a dedication to doing what is right.

Because society does not often teach that a lady is multidimensional, girls should see real women who exhibit these characteristics of a lady. Emma Watson, the actress who played Hermione Granger in the famous Harry Potter series, is as a role model for young girls. She has made education trendy as she attended Brown University, and she does not hesitate, as seen through her campaigns for LGBT, female, and humanitarian rights, to stand for what she believes in. Watson is the epitome of what it means to be a lady; her success, intelligence, and kindness have allowed her to make significant changes in the way the world views women. In the older generation of ladies, Aung San Suu Kyi is a supporter of peaceful demonstrations, a proponent of civil disobedience, and the President of Burma’s National League for Democracy. Suu KYi has used her outspoken personality and passion for equality to promote a democratic government and society. The list of laudable women could continue ad infinitum, and girls should undoubtedly learn from them. Most importantly, though, girls should understand that they can be influential ladies too. If she can, so can I!

Those who are quick to put down the multifaceted interpretation of a lady fail to realize how powerful this type of woman is. It is not to say that women cannot love expensive clothing or have a quiet personality, but women should realize that they are more than a Lily Pulitzer dress, polite manners, or an affluent upbringing. We must stop telling our daughters, nieces, granddaughters, and ourselves to hold our tongues; instead, we must believe in how broad the horizons of our potential are. We must respect all ladies so that we continue to support one another, have courage to speak our minds, and contribute to the world. Our world is changing, so we must encourage each other not to accept the traditional, degrading “act like a lady” nonsense. We must remember that there is much to celebrate about being a female, a woman, and a lady.

Risks 

In my first paragraph, I included multiple fragments that emphasized how degrading my grandma’s expectations of “lady-like conduct” were. These rules made me feel like a dog that was obeying commands. 

I used an anaphora in the last paragraph with the repetition of the words “we must.” My hope was to convey a sense of urgency in the idea that young girls need to feel empowered.

Audience

I addressed my intended audience by including examples of contemporary, well-known women who fit my definition of a lady. I used the narration in my introductory paragraphs to share a story that hopefully teenage girls can relate to if they have been told at some point to “act like a lady.” In the ending paragraph, I use an anaphora by repeating the words “we must”; this repetition was meant to empower teenage girls and show them that I stand with them.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Underlying Motives that Drive Procrastination


(image credit)
Reference: What are the psychological origins of procrastination?

While the explanations in this article make really good sense - i.e. procrastination has roots in what we value, what we believe, and what we are keen to do - there may also be underlying, not-so-apparent, maybe unconscious motives or emotions that drive procrastination.

So for each of us, or for those we may be trying to help, we must vet these explanations vis-a-vis a self-reflection, self-exploration, or self-discovery about what is truly underlying ours or others' difficulties to get things done.

This requires suspending, to begin with, the assumption, judgment or conclusion that it is something as pejorative as procrastination. Our mind, body and spirit may be telling us that what we're trying to do is meaningless and that our meaning or purpose lies somewhere else.

And this may not be so logical or rational!

Friday, July 10, 2015

The Curious Case of Rachel Dolezal (5)


An All In exclusive: Melissa Harris-Perry's extensive interview with the highly controversial former head of the Spokane NAACP, who has been accused of deceiving everyone about her race.
Melissa Harris-Perry is firm but empathic in her interview: She seeks earnestly to understand who Rachel Dolezal is and what she has experienced.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

The Curious Case of Rachel Dolezal (4)


"The city of Spokane, Washington, has opened an investigation into whether Rachel Dolezal, the president of the local chapter of the NAACP, lied about her race when she identified herself as African-American on her application to serve on the citizen police ombudsman commission, thereby violating the city’s code of ethics.

In addition to serving as the chair of the police commission and president of the local NAACP chapter—which the Spokesman Review credits her with revitalizing—Dolezal works as an adjunct faculty member at Eastern Washington University."
Identifying with a race or ethnicity that isn't yours is one thing. But lying, deceiving, or otherwise misrepresenting your race or ethnicity is quite another thing. This is definitely a curious case!
 

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

The Curious Case of Rachel Dolezal (3)


A CNN panel tonight on Rachel Dolezal really just unloaded on her completely unnecessary posing as a black woman when she still could have been involved in race issues as a white woman. Marc Lamont Hill in particular was incredibly puzzled by Dolezal’s actions, saying that no one really chooses to be black as an identity.
"People historically have lied about their race, in order to get more stuff," Hill points out. "Very few people choose Black as an identity, unless they have to. Black is something people have historically tried to get out of, which is also problematic."
 

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

The Curious Case of Rachel Dolezal (2)


Ruthanne and Larry Dolezal, parents of Spokane NAACP President Rachel Dolezal, talk about why their daughter might be masquerading as African-American.
"I think a lot of people are puzzled, this TV anchor [CNN Kate Bolduan] included."
 

Monday, July 6, 2015

The Curious Case of Rachel Dolezal (1)


Rachel Dolezal, president of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP, talks to KXLY4's Jeff Humphrey about several hate crimes she's reported over the years, but walks away from the interview when asked questions about her ethnicity.
"I would love to live in a world where hate crimes didn't exist, and I could assure my children that we're safe," says Dolezal.
 

Friday, March 20, 2015

Social Experiment with Woman Wearing Abaya



Then, there is this video, veritably viral in its own right at nearly 6 million views and over 16,000 comments.

Discuss.

I have had the privilege and pleasure of traveling, living and working in the Middle East, and I can tell you that Arab women of different nationalities in this region garner certain respect and reverence.  People around leave them alone and avoid eye contact, and unless they're friends or colleagues they do not greet people and people do not greet others.  If this video is at all representative of how such women, or women who look Arab, are treated in the US, then that respect and reverence I have seen is evident elsewhere besides the Middle East.  But, to the point of this video, the clothing - called abaya - seems to matter a great deal. 

Discuss further.

Indeed the original 10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman has spawned quite a slew of related videos, for example, as a man, as a homosexual, and as a Jew.

The Human Algorithm is unendingly fascinating!
 

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Social Experiment on Street Harassment


(image credit)
Needless to say, at nearly 40 million views, 10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman is a viral phenomenon.  It also provoked a firestorm of comments, numbering at 143,004 right now.  Some are relatively viral in their own right, and YouTube highlights these as Top Comments.  So have a read.

So as a social experiment, and I use the word experiment very loosely, I imagine the video serves its purpose well.  That is, those who felt moved perhaps donated to Hollaback:
What is Hollaback?

The real motive of street harassment is intimidation. To make its target scared or uncomfortable, and to make the harasser feel powerful. But what if there was a simple way to take that power away by exposing it? You can now use your smartphone to do just that by documenting, mapping, and sharing incidents of street harassment. Join an entire community ready to Hollaback!

Our mission

Hollaback is a movement to end street harassment powered by a network of local activists around the world. We work together to better understand street harassment, to ignite public conversations, and to develop innovative strategies to ensure equal access to public spaces.

Our vision
We envision a world where street harassment is not tolerated and where we all enjoy equal access to public spaces.
Hollaback has admirable lists of Awards + Funders.

Some, perhaps many, scientists would readily balk at how unsystematic this approach is at elucidating the issue of street harassment.  Science works at building our knowledge and understanding of things via research design, statistical analysis, and judicious interpretation of results.  But one reason I used the word experiment earlier is that this sort of video does indeed elucidate street harassment, but not just this: It also elucidates what I have come to call The Human Algorithm.  That is, we millions of viewers and commentators, plus YouTubers who uploaded related videos, are very much part and parcel of this social experiment.

So is Hollaback itself, as it apparently engaged a viral video marketing agency Rob Bliss Creative to provoke, inform and persuade.  Whereas science builds our knowledge and understanding dispassionately, intellectually, even objectively, art (i.e. creativity) does so via emotionally, viscerally and subjectively.  I'd say this agency has been wildly successful with this effort.  Nevertheless, before you open a new tab and click Donate for Hollaback, I suggest watching a thoughtful review from The Young Turks: Discussion About '10 Hours Of Walking In NYC As A Woman' Viral Video.
 

Monday, March 16, 2015

My Greeting Passersby, Passersby Greeting Me



I go for a walk in my neighborhood, and I greet passersby roughly the same number of times as passersby greet me, with Hello, How you doing?, How's it going?, Alright, Good evening, or That's a big dog!  Roughly speaking the people I greet, and those who greet me, are the same number of men as women.

The difference between my circumstances and that of this video?

I am a man.  My neighborhood is in the suburbs. There are few people here (i.e. neighbors), relative to those in the city.  We're probably all in a limited band as far as socioeconomic status goes: middle class.  It's a mostly White American neighborhood, even though I am not.  Moreover, I don't take umbrage at polite, friendly greetings, and the greetings I either initiate or reciprocate are always polite and friendly.  I would take umbrage, though, at greetings that are otherwise.  (rf. Discussion About '10 Hours Of Walking In NYC As A Woman' Viral Video.)

On a few occasions, there are passersby who look immersed in their activity, such as jogging alone or talking with a friend.  I sense this, so I don't greet them and they don't greet me.  I use the best of my empathic sense when, what and whom to greet.  Moreover, sometimes the passersby are young people, for instance, teenage girls, and I sense that it's best not to greet them, so as not to potentially make them nervous; I keep a calm, friendly demeanor, but make no eye contact and look straight ahead all the way.

Friday, March 6, 2015

Weighing Scandal as Complex Phenomenon



I recently posted this video on Google+, and saw it as very unfortunate, even tragic circumstances for these women:

Caroline Norton, Harriet Mordaunt, and Josephine Butler "helped shape new legislation and attitudes towards women in 19th century" England.

I bristle at labeling them as scandalous, which suggests that they were fundamentally at fault, which indeed is precisely how 19th century England saw them (also rf. Scandalous women in British history).  But in fact their actions and circumstances were more complex than such a label suggests: Scandal as a phenomenon is a product of culture, era and discrimination (i.e. context) as well as of gender, personality and determination (i.e. individual).  So certainly these women were agents in shaping circumstances, but they were also victims of conniving powerful figures.  In the end, agent or victim notwithstanding, they helped evolve views and policies toward greater equality between men and women.
 

Friday, January 9, 2015

"Give a man a fish" is a Commentary on Us


(image credit)
I have read Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching a few times over 35 years, and I have to review all 81 chapters again to see if this well known fish saying is actually in it.  I just don't remember seeing it in that venerable text.  But if it sounds remotely ancient Chinese in origin, then so it is, I suppose, a commentary on us:
The English version that Yeti posted is what I hear foreigners use all the time. The inherited Chinese version is now becoming common, too, but the wording is still all over the place — I have also seen the “授人鱼,供一餐之用;授人渔,则享用不尽” version. The citers basically all begin with “ancient people stated…”, “ancient people said…”, “there’s an old saying…” with some going so far as to use “foreigners say China has this ancient saying…” etc. This is one of the many unsettled issues in the world’s gold-jade beautiful words industry. Everybody propagates, everybody uses, full of creativity and wisdom. Even though everybody keeps saying this is “Chinese wisdom”, Chinese scholars are still pedantic. Is this really a case of “[cultural] exchange” or “piracy” and “counterfeit”? No one can determine. Where do words originate? Very likely only God knows :-)

“Confucius says, ‘May you live in interesting times!’”,“There’s a Chinese proverb, “Don’t take off your pants when having sex.” This type of dubious [“] Chinese [”] old sayings are as abundant as a cow’s hair, no way to verify them one by one. Some are altogether made up by foreigners who, in order to heighten effects, put their own witticism on Chinese philosophers’ heads. If the thing is composed rather cleverly, like this “fish/fishing” one, then it becomes widespread. When it spreads to China, prominent people have this translation, and it sounds authentic to boot. Such a high-quality maxim, who can refuse? This process of establishing a common expression as “a Chinese ancient saying” is actually quite logical.

However, China does have the expression “救急不救穷” [“to relieve emergency doesn’t relieve poverty”], now that’s indeed very Chinese. “Fish/fishing” looks like the complement of “救急不救穷”, with illustrative metaphors added. Translated to Chinese, it becomes all kinds of versions of a “Chinese ancient saying”.
Reference: Give a man a fish...

Because Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime speaks well to the Theory of Algorithms, I believe in its emphasis on self-sufficiency and hard work.  In other words, education may indeed be at the heart of solving any and all problems we may face.  But the saying itself is a curiosity, isn't it.  It is easy enough on the internet to find threads on a topic and follow them wherever they may lead.  A couple of sites did attribute it to an ancient Chinese proverb, as in the image above.  But apparently that is not true:
The expression actually originated in Britain in the mid 19th century.

Anne Isabella Ritchie, the daughter of William Makepeace Thackeray... wrote a story titled Mrs. Dymond, sometime in the 1880s and it includes this line:
"He certainly doesn't practise his precepts, but I suppose the patron meant that if you give a man a fish he is hungry again in an hour; if you teach him to catch a fish you do him a good turn."

The proverb dates from 1885 or shortly before and there's every reason to suppose that it was coined by Anne Ritchie.

The source of the mid-20th century and Chinese origin theories are various US magazines from the 1960s, for example, The Rotarian (June 1964):

... the Chinese axiom "Give a man a fish, and you have fed him once. Teach him how to fish and you have fed him for a lifetime."

Publications of that sort were what brought the proverb into general use but, as we have seen, weren't the actual source.
Reference: Give a man a fish...

Nevertheless, I marvel at how the internet, and social media in particular, enables our drawing of such a saying for inspiration, sharing it with countless others, and attributing it to whomever and whatever sounds good (or not even attributing it to anything at all).  It is impractical to verify this saying completely, but now that I have my eyes and ear open for additional clues on its origins, I am doubly delighted.  I smile at how some prominent Chinese apparently own it and propagate it on its faux origins, because why not after all.

Friday, September 12, 2014

The Curious Case of Lester Burdon


Movies have enriched our lives with such a wealth of stories and characters, behind which talented writers, directors and actors operate like drivers behind the wheel.  By and large, it is all fiction, but to the extent that movies as an art form can illuminate things about ourselves, each other, and the world around us, then they serve a very real purpose.  This week I look at three curious characters, who, in each case, figure in the profound human drama that they inhabit and define.


House of Sand and Fog is a 2003 film directed by Vadim Perelman, based on the Andres Dubus III novel, and what a tragic story it is.  Academy Award winners Jennifer Connelly as Kathy Nicolo and Ben Kingsley as Massoud Amir Behrani head up a cast of deft acting, but my article focuses on Ron Eldard as Lester Burdon.  Nicolo and Behrani lead troubled lives, and they're on a collision course with the titular house dead center in the crosshairs.  I argue that Burdon is as the incendiary agent, who implicates himself into all of this and ignites a horrible tragedy.  It is a case of an honest, earnest man, who is keen to help Nicolo but who makes matters worse, instead.

Eight month before the story started, Nicolo and her husband split up.  Evidently this was such a disheartening experience for her, that she was virtually immobilized in her home:  not taking care of herself, not opening her mail.  She was so embarrassed about the split up that she decided not to mention it to her family.  So when her annoying mother wedges herself into an upcoming visit, Nicolo tells her that her husband will be on a business trip.   

She is a down in the dumps woman, and this is first underpinning of the tragedy.

Soon after that early morning phone call with her mother, some authorities barge into her house and stick eviction notices on her front and back doors.  Nicolo is stunned, then baffled, then distraught.  Deputy Sheriff Burdon is along for the eviction, and quickly we see that he likes her.  He takes a more kindly tact with her, and offers to help pack up her belongings.  He is pragmatic as well as encouraging, and persuades her not to take a stand against the eviction orders.

Nicolo is reminiscing over some photos in her storage space that night, when Burdon startles her with a visit.  He is out of uniform this time, because his duty for the day is done.  More than just kindly or encouraging, we see the initial sparks of attraction on his face.  We find out gradually that he has fallen out of love and that his marriage is just one of sparing displays of affection for his wife.  They  have two children, whom he had promised never to abandon, especially after his own father had done that.  But the glimmer of a way out of a loveless marriage is matched by the dark prospects of doing that very thing to his children.

These initial run-ins between Nicolo and Burdon add another combustible layer to the tragedy. 

He drives her back to her motel, and advises her in no uncertain terms not to go back to her house and instead let her lawyer handle things.  She doesn't listen.  Later that evening, the motel clerk knocks on her door and tells that her credit card payment didn't go through.  So she makes a hasty departure, that is, without checking out, and parks her car for the night in front of her house.

The next morning, her house is a construction site, as Behrani and his family have not only moved in, but they're also remodeling the house.  It's like falling behind in a long race, then in a blink of an eye, you're lagging even further from the others.  Just like that, her house is blatantly out of her control.  It is in this unfortunate state of mind that this time, she seeks out Burdon directly.  She drives over to the police station, pleasantly surprisingly him of course:  They have lunch seaside among squawking gulls, then they have dinner over romantic lighting, and then at her behest they make love tenderly.  They are two troubled souls who find some longed-for comfort and intimacy.  There is no one step, no one moment or decision that makes things the way they are for people, would-be lovers in particular, but rather a series of such steps, moments and decisions.   

All told, our human drama progresses in foreboding fashion. 

Burdon puts Nicolo up in temporary quarters, and the day after their lovemaking, she returns to find him sitting at a small table and two bags on the floor at his side.  He's left his family.  She remarks half-jokingly that they're both homeless now.  She admits to him that once again, she had paid her house a visit, even more disturbed to find that Behrani was entertaining two prospective buyers for the house.

He bought the house for a ridiculous $45,000 auction price from the county, and from a recent appraisal it was worth $174,000 in the market.  He was a decorated colonel in the Persian military, and the family lived a lavish lifestyle.  From what we can determine, when the Shah of Iran was overthrown, his cronies and their families also had to flee the country.  Behrani had amassed quite a savings, but with only measly income from a construction site and gas station jobs, his family was burning through it all quickly in their lavish apartment.  So the earnings from the house sale meant way more than just profit for him; it was also a major step toward recovering his dignity and lifestyle.

In their little chat, Burdon notices the welts on Nicolo's arm, where Behrani had to unceremoniously escort the errant lady back to her car.  He had prospective buyers who were interested, and she was literally a fly in his ointment.  The mild-mannered, caring man we saw was now combusting.  Off the chair and pacing the room, Burdon is angry at what happened to his lover and he schemes to pay the proud colonel a visit himself.

Imagine this:  You're years into a loveless marriage, feeling unhappy and trapped.  Then, finally when you spy hope and love in the arms of a beguilingly attractive woman, you will want to protect what you have found.  The fact that she is troubled gives him reason to help, and perhaps in his mind it also lends him some grace or salvation from what he had just done to  his family.  Evidently he has more than a bit of a temper, to boot.

She seems ennobled and emboldened, but in the process Burdon crosses another fateful line. 

Behrani is kindly and accommodating when Burdon pops in, wearing his uniform and sporting his medals.  His idea was to frighten the new owner into selling the house back to the county for the price he paid.  We already know that the market price has far greater personal import for Behrani - it is a matter of necessity for him and his family, as he pointed out to Nicolo's lawyer - but unfortunately Burdon has no idea of the story behind it all.  Nicolo has a bit more knowledge and insight about the family, but he is full of prejudice in his mind, full of love in his heart, and full of fire in his eyes. 

He is a loose canon, that is getting looser yet.

Burdon returns to the car, with Nicolo there waiting, after his tense run-in with the colonel.  It is ironic that he felt that Behrani listened to what he had to say, meaning that he will do what he demanded after threatening deportation for the family.  First, Behrani did listen, but filed a formal complaint directly with the police department, instead.  Second, in the heat of his own efforts, Burdon no longer listens very well to Nicolo.

Clinical psychologists may be prone to ascribe this dynamics to Nicolo herself, that is, via projective identification she gets her lover to act out her disappointment and anger and to do the strong-arming that she cannot do.  However, I beg to differ:  Burdon carries quite a bit of his own baggage into the combustible mix.  If there is any projective identification going on, then he adds to it with his own readiness to dispense altogether with any defensive mechanism like sublimation and instead tap into displacement.  In brief, Nicolo gives him as much reason to unleash his pent-up disappointment and anger and his previously-closeted rescue fantasy, as he gives Nicolo the means to relieve her despondency and recover her house.

Lester and Kathy are not at all Romeo and Juliet, but the terribly entangled lives that they now lead push them to an end as heartbreaking as that of Romeo and Juliet.   

After that ill-fated visit to the house, Burdon drives to a friend's cabin a few miles out of town, where, clearly in Nicolo's mind, they have a bit of a makeshift home together.  More lovemaking between them that night, as she rises out of bed the next morning fully unclothed and feels a certain joyfulness in the outdoor light.  She cleans the whole cabin, and proudly announces it to him, when he returns.  But he is out of sorts.  He explains to her that he has to go back home to explain things more clearly to his wife and that he has to be home when his children arrive back from school.  His repeated mention of home with his family hurts her and frightens her.  He promises to return in a few hours, but in the dark of the cabin a few hours later, she is sitting by herself with two uneaten dinner plates.

Without meaning to, Burdon has triggered Nicolo's own fear of abandonment.  

Terribly distraught now, she heads for the convenience store at the nearest gas station, and buys up smokes and liquor.  Apparently she means to burn the house down, when she buys a red gasoline container and a book of matches.  But when she finds Burdon's bag in the trunk with his holstered gun inside, she comes up with an alternative plan.  She drives to the house again, takes swigs of liquor, and points the gun up under her chin.  She pulls the trigger, but nothing happens.  Just a click.  Aggravated she points it to her temple and inserts it in her mouth, and once again just a series of empty clicks.  She evidently didn't engage the magazine properly.

Behrani hears her shouts, and hurries outside to find her trying to off herself.  He quickly secures the gun, and carries her inside.  It is a dramatic turn of heart for him, as now he feels nothing but compassion and care for her.  In the lowest of lows, feeling abandoned, she clutches his hand and refuses to let him go.  A bit later, she rises from bed to use the bathroom, and Behrani's wife encourages her to take a warm bath.  She is evidently not done trying to off herself, as she overdoses on an entire medication bottle.  The family is once again frantic in rescuing her.  Behrani's wife manages to get Nicolo to vomit, after finding her unconscious in the bathtub.

In the meantime, Burdon does return to the cabin much later than expected, but Nicolo had long left.  He drives over to the house, looks in from the back, and sees Behrani's son sitting in the kitchen and mesmerized by the gun on the table.  He breaks in, recovers his own gun, and sees the family dragging his half-conscious lover out of the bathroom.  They explain to him what happened, but he does not believe them.  He orders them to take her to the bedroom, and holds them hostage in the bathroom for the night.

Remember, Burdon is a loose canon, who doesn't know the whole story, doesn't listen very well, and simply doesn't do the right thing.

Tragedy at this point is a runaway train, and there is no stopping it anymore.  The next morning, Behrani offers a workable resolution:  He will sell the house back to the county for $45,000, and give the check to the couple.  In exchange, Nicolo must agree to sign the title back to him.  It's a win-win proposition that resonates rather well with the pragmatic nature of Burdon's personality.  However, she just wants to go.  She's put herself and the family through hell, and the fact that they took care of her and saved her life, prompts her to simply let the whole affair go.  Again he doesn't listen.  He knows that the money can give them a good fresh start together.

So with Behrani at the wheel, they drive over to the courthouse, with the son in tow.  Burdon's plan was for Behrani to do what he promised, while he and the son waited in the car.  But Behrani was worried for his son, and insisted that he come along into the courthouse.  Of course, this meant that Burdon had to escort them inside, that is, expose himself in the company of some of his colleagues.  It's a tense walk up down the sidewalk and up the steps, with him looking bedraggled, his uniform half-untucked.  Once they round a corner, however, Burdon pushes Behrani against a pillar and threatens him one last time before they go inside.  The son, who was mesmerized with the gun the night before, jumps at the opportunity to grab the gun from Burdon's side.

The two men are both frantic now.  Behrani grabs Burdon, but Burdon is not worried about him as he was about the son.  The son is nervously pointing the gun at the erstwhile officer, while the two men shout at him to put it down.  In the meantime, two officers arrive at the bottom of the steps, and have a clear view of the son.  Unwittingly and tragically, the son shifts focus:  If he knew better, he'd have dropped the gun and put his hands up.  But he wasn't born in the US, so he didn't know what he was supposed to do.  So as he turns to look at the two officers below, the pointed gun in his outstretched arms follows suit as his whole body shifts.  One officer shoots him dead center in the chest, in a tragic instance of self defense.

Burdon, Behrani and Nicolo are, by all accounts, well-meaning people.  Granted, they are imperfect characters, but that is just human nature.  They all try to do the right thing, under whatever circumstances they find themselves in a given moment, but their character flaws and situational distress combine for one incendiary ending to the story.  I've watched this film quite a few times now, as it's clearly one of my top favorites, and recently found myself wishing:  If only each of them had listened, and stepped back a moment, and weighed matters thoughtfully, and proceeded calmly, an entire tragedy could've been averted.  Again they're not bad people, just as many, many of us aren't bad people, either.

But one wrong choice isn't just an isolated, one-off choice.  Rather it's one of a series of wrong choices along a road, contrary to Robert Frost's iconic poem, that is most definitely well-traveled.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

The Curious Case of Lori Cranston


Movies have enriched our lives with such a wealth of stories and characters, behind which talented writers, directors and actors operate like drivers behind the wheel.  By and large, it is all fiction, but to the extent that movies as an art form can illuminate things about ourselves, each other, and the world around us, then they serve a very real purpose.  This week I look at three curious characters, who, in each case, figure in the profound human drama that they inhabit and define.



Tenderness is a 2009 film by John Polson, based on the Robert Cormier novel, and it intertwines the lives of three people with surgical efficiency and precision:  Russell Crowe as Lt. Cristofuoro, Jon Foster as Eric Komenko, and Sophie Traub as Lori Cranston.  Every scene, every image and remark, have a purpose.  It's as taut as a human drama can be, and it reverberates with a mixture of hope and despair, not to mention murderous tension.
Cristofuoro:  My wife likes to say there are two kinds of people, those chasing pleasure, and those running from pain. [Lori] Cranston is running. Running from all kinds of everything. Probably has been her whole life.
Lori is a troubled 16-year old.  Off the bat, we see her with her shirt lifted up over her breasts and her manager sitting at his desk, masturbating to her.  Soon thereafter we get unmistakable hints that her mother's new boyfriend is also pursuing and abusing her:  He slips into the bathroom while she's taking a shower, for instance.  Later on, she suggests that he fingered her sexually, while they were on a private camping trip.  No doubt, Cristofuoro is right:  She probably has a history of such abuse, so it's no surprise that she walks about with such a despondent, sometimes pained look. 

Eric murdered his parents at age 15, and the judge tried him as an adolescent.  He had been taking Zoloxia, and he took into account the possibility that this antidepressant contributed to the gruesome homicidal impulse.  So now that he is age 18, officials must release him and expunge the crime from his record.  Cristofuoro has had an unusual obsession with him, not only from his arrest and throughout his imprisonment, but also after his release.  He knows the young man is a psychopath, and will kill again.

Lori and Eric were fated to collide.  So when the news breaks of his impending release, Lori immediately takes note.  She was in the woods, watching him and a girl kiss intimately, and that has had a lasting impression on her.  She was witness, too, to his killing that girl, which remains an unsolved murder.  What's more, apparently he had posthumous sex with her, according to the coroner's report.  Afterwards she maneuvered to run into him on the bridge, and they made small talk in passing.  She was so taken by what she saw that she drew the couple kissing and she collected articles about the murders in her scrapbook. 

Lori longs for caring and intimacy.  This is what drives her to hook up with him, finding her way to his car by whatever means necessary.  She even persuaded a random guy at the gasoline station to give her a ride, in exchange for some kisses, and she stole his wallet in the meantime.  She waited all evening in the rain outside his house, before stealing into his car.

On my first watch of the film, I thought Lori also had a palpable death wish.  What better way to fulfill that than by hooking up with a murderer?  After watching it again, and studying it further, however, I saw that the will to live and have fun, to connect and be intimate, was a more powerful motive for her.  At least at first.  She certainly tried numerous ways to win his affections and get him to do whatever he wanted to do to her, that is, sexually.  She responded pragmatically but flirtatiously, when he said he wanted to be alone to focus and get a fresh start:
It doesn't get any fresher than old Lori. I'm basically a virgin...  Think of me as a dry run for a real girlfriend, somebody important.
There is tragic irony, wrapped in tragic irony in this film, which to me makes it a far more deft and brilliant film than critics and audiences gave it credit.  Let me explain the psychology - what I call The Human Algorithm - between Lori and Eric:

Lori's efforts to win Eric's affections ultimately fail.  Her efforts are frankly misguided, because she has no clue that what happened that afternoon by the river was an altered state for him.  He is not turned on by a girl, at least not in the normal sense and certainly not in the way that Lori had imagined.  Consider the following screen shots from the film, with Cristofuoro explaining the young man's psyche:







Three times, nevertheless, Eric slipped into that trance and aimed to kill Lori:  (a) by strangling her at the rest stop, (b) by beating her with a hammer, and (c) by suffocating her with a pillow.  But every single time, it didn't happen.  He somehow missed the chance to kill her, or alternatively put, she somehow managed to evade his killing her. 

In fact, on the bed in the motel room, with her feeling rather distraught at how things were turning out between the two of them, she goads him into using his hands to kill her and exposes her neck for him to choke the life out of her:
Do it.  Dissolve me.  Do it.
But he is stunned, and her outright wish for him to kill her jars him out of that murderous trance, unexpectedly so.  There he sat beside her, pillow on hand, and ready to snuff her.  But he is not in control, and this is not how it should go, so amazingly again he does nothing. 

Sigmund Freud theorized that in each of us were the opposing drives of thanatos (death wish) and eros (life instinct, sexual impulse).  At the end of the day, Lori was literally Eric's eros.  She even saved him from a questionable sting that Cristofuoro set up to put Eric back in prison, and in his subdued way he was more than thankful to her. 

But thanatos was never far away for them.  All else having failed, Lori falls back into the lake, from a boat they had stolen, and drowns herself.  He, alarmed and frantic, desperately tries to rescue her.  He extended the oar, but she refused to grab it.  He jumped in, but after several moments of looking for her underwater, he found her slumped face down.  He drags her limp body back to the boat, where ironically he displays the greatest intimacy for her:  He embraces her tightly, hoping she were still alive, wailing furiously and intimately.  He realizes that she is truly dead, so he lets her go into the water, just as he did with that girl in the river years before. 

The irony for Cristofuoro is that Eric was again involved with a girl who died, but this time had no responsibility for it.  The incident landed Eric back in prison, however, where Cristofuoro felt he belonged all along.  Because he was a killer psychopath, after all. 

The irony for Eric is that he felt genuine affection for a girl, in such a way and to such a degree that he probably had never felt before.  His failure to kill her was testament to how much of a life force she had been to him.

The irony for Lori was that dark Freudian drive fulfilled.  But she literally had to take matters into her own hand, and the caring and intimacy she longed for so terribly came at last, but only after she had died.

Monday, September 8, 2014

The Curious Case of Coleman Silk


Movies have enriched our lives with such a wealth of stories and characters, behind which talented writers, directors and actors operate like drivers behind the wheel.  By and large, it is all fiction, but to the extent that movies as an art form can illuminate things about ourselves, each other, and the world around us, then they serve a very real purpose.  This week I look at three curious characters, who, in each case, figure in the profound human drama that they inhabit and define.

  

The Human Stain is a Robert Benton film, adapted from a Philip Roth novel, and while critics were lukewarm at best, I saw it as an American tragedy that Anthony Hopkins as Coleman Silk, Nicole Kidman as Faunia Farley, and Gary Sinise as Nathan Zuckerman pull off deftly and powerfully.  The curious love affair between Silk and Farley may be the centerpiece that Benton chose, but the engine that drives the story is a tectonic secret that Silk grew to wear like second skin over his life.

You see, Silk is African American, but unlike his parents, brother and sister, his skin color is so fair that he can, and does, pass as White.  As a Jewish man, in fact.  Silk is a rising talent in the boxing ring as an older adolescent, and his coach encourages him to apply to the University of Pittsburgh and advises him not to mention that he was "colored."  This advice still echoing in his ears, he completes an application to the Navy by checking off the box for "White."

Much later in life, Silk is an esteemed Classics professor, and in taking attendance for one lecture, he wonders if two students who haven't attended a single class five weeks into the course were "spooks."  Silk meant the term as ghost or specter, but when those very students caught wind of his remark, they filed a grievance for racism.  Not so much common nowadays, "spook" is a derogatory term for an African American.

Silk flies off in a rage, abruptly ending a private conference with the college dean and her senior faculty.  He is fully aware of the secondary meanings of the word, but he asks his colleagues how can he possibly have meant "spook" to be a racist insult when he hadn't even laid eyes on those students.  He didn't know that they were African Americans.  But when his inquisitors try to get him to acknowledge the students' complaint, he simply will not hear any of it.

The unfortunate irony of this testy conference, as the story will unfold, is that the dean and faculty do not really know why Silk is so furious.  If they only knew that he himself was African American, then maybe they'd have a much different perspective on the whole grievance.  Yet, decades into a racial and religious lie, Silk doesn't even come close to unveiling that lie to save his professorship and reputation.

This irony is more complex, however.  We may very well believe that Silk didn't mean "spooks" to be racist.  But his flat disavowal of his own race is a kind of reverse racism.  Some Filipinos, for comparison, are ashamed of their own heritage, and prefer to assimilate wholesale into American culture, for instance, and adopt an American (i.e., White) demeanor, mindset and lifestyle.  I know, my family and I were like that.  As for The Human Stain, we'd probably have good ground to stand on in viewing Silk as a closet racist.

Why does Silk disavow his race?  The easy response is, because, ever so fair complexioned, he can.  But the next response is telling:  He simply doesn't identify with "We, the Negro People."  I imagine that some of us are like that:  We don't fashion our identity according to nationality, race or ethnicity.  We don't feel beholden to a particular group, despite the fact that society in general and our family in particular may expect us to feel so.

Consider this exchange between Silk as an adolescent and his mother:
Mrs. Silk: You need to be proud of your race.
Silk: What about me? What about just being proud of being me? It's my life.
Further:
Mrs. Silk: Funny I never thought of you as black or white. Gold, you were my golden child.
The family is clearly a proud African American family, and modeled after Mr. and Mrs. Silk's values, the children are bright, earnest and hardworking.  So as they catch wind of how Silk poses as a White Jew, they aren't just perplexed but also hurt.

While a university student, Silk meets, and falls in love, with Steena Paulsson:
Silk: So, that's an... What is it? Swedish?

Paulsson: Close, it's Danish and Icelandic.
As the couple feel more intimate and comfortable with one another, and want to spend the rest of their lives together, Silk invites her to meet his family.  He is still early in his racial and religious lie, and may have thought that his girlfriend and mother in particular would navigate the apparent differences between them just fine.  But no.  Upon their meeting at the door and together at the dining table, neither Paulsson nor Mrs. Silk could disavow the very fact of race.  It quietly shocked both of them, that each was of a race that neither one expected.

Paulsson, sullen and tearful on their train ride back to the university, confesses that she cannot deal with this.  The racial difference may not have been a major issue for her.  But the fabricated front that was her boyfriend, plus the lingering aftershock over family dinner, must've told her right away that this intimate, comfortable relationship was anything but that. 

It was a very painful lesson learned for Coleman Silk, but the lesson wasn't the right one:  Instead of unveiling his lie, or even acknowledging his African American identity, he redoubles his efforts to pass off as a White man.  His father already dead, he has been telling others that his parents were dead, and in a cruel bit of conversation, shares his fact with his mother.  Deeply hurt, she wonders aloud what he was going to do, if he and his future wife were to raise a family and their children were dark-skinned.  Further, she paints a sorrowful scenario where he wouldn't allow their children and her to see each other:  He'd make her stay inside the train station and sit by a window, where he'd walk by with her grandchildren.
Mrs. Silk: Coleman, you think like a prisoner. You're white as snow, and you think like a slave.
Wise motherly words.

Shame and hatred must've become more powerful, pernicious drivers for that lie, until that reverse racism coursed so deeply in Silk and defined who he was as a man.